LEL 2

LEL 1

1. Interrest level : This course wasn't really interresting, but still okay. Some questions were a little boring, especially the situation questions, but there was a question about a text on an evironmental problem. I found it fascinating. I was glad to analyse a poem by Emily Dickinson, because last time I had difficulty with poetry. I don't know much about English poetry and I'm always happy to learn new things.

2. Difficulty level : It was intermediate level. The questions weren't really hard to answer, except those in the litterature section. Narrative and explicative texts were easy to understand, but I had some difficulty again with the poetry section. 

3. What I learned : I learned to pay attention while reading poetic texts and how to find metaphors. In the text on the environmental problem I learned to distinguish different situations and how to associate problems (what causes them) and their solutions.  

4. My score : I had 79. I'm disappointed because I expected a better grade than the one I had at the last LEL, but it took me less time to do this course, so it's okay.

5. Rating on ten : I would rate this course 7 on 10. Poetry and narrative texts are more interresting than explicative ones, and harder to understand. 


LEL 2

Reading Skills Diagnostic 1: Persuasive Text

1. Interrest level : I didn't find this course especially interresting. Maybe it's because I prefer narrative texts. The subject of the text wasn't fascinating, even though I liked to read the opinion of the author.

2. Difficulty level : It wasn't hard, but I took more time to answer some questions, like those about predicting meanings and finding details.

3. What I learned: All the questions were pointing out a different aspect of the text. I found out I had facility to read correctly a persuasive text, beacause I can easily regnognize opinions, facts, main idea and the purpose of the author. I also worked on identify structure, points of view, meanings and learned some vocabulary.

4. My score : I had 81, which is a good grade. I believe I could have get a better mark if I had payed more attention while reading the questions.

5. Rating : I would this course seven on ten, because even if I found it boring, it helped me a lot to find my weakness in reading persuasive text.